We bring you the updates for last week. Hope it updates you with all the news from legal world.
8th December 2014:
The division bench of Supreme Court has
struck down the legality of provisions in certain circulars which banned hookah smoking and sale of cigarettes in designated smoking areas. With this three
High Court (Bombay, Gujarat and Madras) decisions is overturned. The illegality
of circulars was found on the basis of it being violative of COTPA Act, 2003
and Rules.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a plea
challenging the recent ordinance on Coal Block Allocations which is to be heard
on 6th December. The Court had earlier declined a batch of petition
by private companies seeking that it re-look its September 24 order cancelling
214 coal blocks allocated from 1993 to 2011.
9th December 2014:
A Delhi Court has held fourmen guilty for murdering L.N. Mishra, the then Railway Minster in a bomb
blast on January 2, 1975. This trial is one of the longest drawn trials in
India. Over 200 witnesses were examined in the case. Though the charge-sheet
was filed in 1977 in a CBI court in Patna, the conviction has come only after
about 40 years of the murder. Earlier in 2012, the accused approached the
Supreme Court for quashing the trial against them as the case has not been
concluded even after 37 years, which was not accepted by the apex court and was
returned to the Delhi Court. The quantum of sentence would be pronounced on
15th December.
10th December 2014:
The Central Government announced that
section 309, attempt to commit suicide, will be deleted from Indian Penal Code
(IPC) which will decriminalize the act of commitment of suicide. The decision
is based on the request by 18 states and 44 Union territories to implement the
Recommendations made in this regard by the Law Commission of India in its 210th
Report. The report made reference to P.
Rathinam v. Union of India, where
the Supreme Court of India held that Section 309 of IPC is violative of Article
21 of the Constitution of India. The same was overruled in Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab,
however The Mental Health Bill of 2013 did attempt to decriminalize the same by
putting presumption of mental illness on the persons attempting to commit
suicide.
The Kerala High Court has concluded that
the DLF violated the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification (CRZ Notification) and
therefore ordered the demolition of the construction under DLF project in Kochi.
The Court held that:
“Authorities
are constituted under various enactments to see that the environment is
protected and to see that the present topography which keeps the ecological
balance is not disturbed. The purpose of these laws is to preserve nature for
posterity. If the violation of these laws is allowed to become the order of the
day, the existence of life would be at peril. Right to life guaranteed by our
Constitution takes in innumerable rights, including the right to enjoy nature
in the present form. Indiscriminate invasion of nature to the detriment of
others is an invasion of right to life. Nature which is the property of the
nation cannot be allowed to be scrambled by a minority violating all laws.”
11th December 2014:
The Delhi High Court injuncted Xiaomi, a
Chinese phone manufacturer, from selling, advertising, manufacturing or importing
devices that infringe the Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) in question. The same
SEPs are also a subject matter of a pending litigation between Ericsson and
Micromax, Gionee, Intex. In an ex-parte order passed against Xiaomi,
the court also directed Customs Department to stop import of such products as
per the IPR Rules, 2007. It is worth noting that Xiaomi managed to sell out its
50,000 handset in just 6 seconds on 8th December.
12th December:
Hearing an appeal filed by the
Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare (DESW) against a judgment of the Armed Forces
Tribunal (AFT), the Supreme Court had to decide the question of benefits of an
extra amount in pensions on account of disability due to service conditions of
the ex-servicemen of the Army. The Bench headed by HL Dattu, CJI, said:
“They are in the line of fire. They sacrifice their life for you and for us. This is the least you could do for them. The government can have at least this much
of budget for its soldiers who are dying for the people of this country
everyday. What is the point of having these memorials and placards saluting our
defence personnel if you litigate against the disabled soldiers till the Supreme
Court. You should pay them,”
The Government agreed to comply with
the order. The Supreme Court dismissed the matter, as a result disposing 880
appeals on the issue. It has also been reported that around 15,000 retired
soldiers will be benefited due to the order.
The Social Justice Bench constituted to hear cases pertaining to “Social
Justice” matters began with the division bench of Justice Madan B Lokur and
Justice UU Lalit. The bench will take up fresh matters alongside the pending
matters and will sit every Friday at 2PM at the Supreme Court. The bench was
constituted to achieve the Constitutional goal of securing social justice for
the citizens of the country.
The Supreme Court has dismissed Bayer’s
Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the decision of the Bombay High Court.
This dismissal will continue the effectiveness of grant of compulsory license
to Natco for Bayer’s anticancer drug Nexavar. This has continued the Indian
Courts’ stand to ensure the access to medicine across the country.
We hope that this summarizes the last week's News. Your comments and suggestions are welcomed.
Until next post of weekly News updates.
Manish Kumar, (3rd Year student of IIT Kharagpur Law School)
For 'OFF Court.'
Disclaimer: This blog or any post thereof is not to be considered to be in any way associated with the official stand of IIT kharagpur or RGSOIPL on the issues being discussed in the said post. The opinions on the blog are the authors own and should not be considered as legal advice.
Disclaimer: This blog or any post thereof is not to be considered to be in any way associated with the official stand of IIT kharagpur or RGSOIPL on the issues being discussed in the said post. The opinions on the blog are the authors own and should not be considered as legal advice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Lets Discuss