A few weeks back, one night I felt
sudden craving for a cigarette, so I got out to a nearby shop to buy one. The
first shop had no cigarette!! No problem, IIT is full of canteens that sell it.
I went on to next destination and then to another one only to find that no one
is selling it.
‘This can’t be coincidence’ I
thought. I asked to the shopkeeper, why all shops are out of cigarettes today?
Who has bought it all?
‘IIT Director’s notice, Can’t sell
cigarettes!’ the shopkeeper answered mechanically.
Of all the days, the administration
was to wake up today only!!!
But why stop it now when you never
gave a damn about it? There are reasons for it, but administration gave a straight
forward answer. It is illegal to sell cigarettes inside campus. They are health
hazards.
Absolutely right!!
But they were supposed to have never allowed
smoking inside campus. It is more harmful than drinking alcohol (this is just
comparative magnitude I am talking about; it does not support alcoholism at
all). In fact, irreversible harm is caused by smoking, whether active or
passive.
The WHO has indicated in its report
that 76% of Indian films influence the youth to take up smoking and by 2020,
70% of deaths due to tobacco use, would be in the average or low income groups,
especially in India and China. Almost Rs. 13,000 crore was spent in the year
2004 and it crossed Rs. 30,000 crore in less than a year, on the treatment of
tobacco related diseases.[1]
The effect is worse for passive smokers. Second Hand Smoke (SHS) is known to
contain more than 4000 toxins which include carcinogens (cancer causing
agents). Exposure to SHS leads to lung cancer and heart diseases in adults and
lung diseases and other health problems in children.
Then what is government doing in
this regard? For any government the very first step is a strong legislation,
the second one is enforcement and then vigilant judicial activism to bridge the
lacuna in the system.
Strong Legislation
India, being a major tobacco consuming
nation, has its own challenge of curbing the stigma. India enacted national
tobacco-control legislation namely ‘COTPA Act, 2003’ on May 15, 2003 and ratified
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) on February 5, 2004. COTPA Act
aimed to restrict tobacco advertisements, sponsorship and promotion,
establishing new labeling of tobacco with strong health warning and
establishing clean indoor air controls. This objective was intended by imposing
restriction on smoking in public places and other related policies.
The main feature of this legislation
was complete ban on smoking in public places, prohibition of sale of tobacco
products to minors and sale of cigarettes and tobacco products within a radius
of 100 yards (91.44 meters) of educational institutions. The term ‘public place’
(in this Act) is vague and it needs to be defined specifically. (Section 6)
Administrative Actions
The Government of India enforced the
laws with utmost sincerity. The Union
Health Ministry immediately took action by notifying Delhi Government to check
and regulate the violators of the Act. Banners and Hoardings of ‘Marlboro’ were
removed with immediate effect. Show cause notice was issued to the Managing
Editor of the Stardust magazine for violation of provisions of the Act. Also
greeting cards of Gold Flake, i.e. ‘Gold Flake Expression’ were stopped from
distribution as it amounted to direct or indirect advertisement.[2]
Furthermore, the government
tightened the loopholes in tobacco control rules. Ban on sale of tobacco
products by minors, through wending machines, ban on display of any tobacco or
related products on TV and movies, notice of health warning while any smoking scene
is broadcasted, masking the brand name of such products etc. were made
mandatory so that minors do not get access to such lethal smoke.[3]
No Smoking Zone inside IIT Kharagpur |
What I mean to state is that the laws
are stringent; the government is actively and effectively trying to implement it
as well. How IIT Kharagpur, then, was overlooking the government norms? Can
IITs, being an autonomous body, keeping in mind the cultural habit of West
Bengal, make such rules and regulations that allow smoking in public places?
Isn’t it a violation of legislative mandate?
Is it not obvious that allowing the
sale of cigarettes inside campus will provide free-rider to businesspersons to
sell it to students, irrespective of them being minors or adults? IIT can be
considered as a small village, a model village of our country. From far East to
West and from South to extreme North, each state has sent best of their brains
to nurture and evolve as prime in their respective fields. Can local culture be
allowed to breach such a great cause?
On 14th February 2008,
the University of Delhi was declared “No Smoking Zone.” A movement then started
and smoking was strictly prohibited in academic institutes all over the
country. Unfortunately, we still fall back (greatly) in this movement.
Judiciary speaks
IIT Rules itself prohibits smoking. But when it comes to practicality, arguments are advanced with regard to local
cultural habit of West Bengal. National Green Tribunal recently declared (Decision) that
IIT can’t be above law and therefore it has to follow the law in toto.
Honorable Supreme Court of India has read smoking in public places in violation of Article 21,
further listing a few ‘public places’ such as Auditoriums, Hospital Buildings,
Health Institutions, Educational Institutions, Libraries, Court Buildings,
Public Office, Public Conveyances, including Railways, where smoking is
absolutely prohibited.
In case of Cancer Patients Aid
Association v. Karnataka Health and
Family Welfare Dept., et. al. (2009,
2010 and 2010)
at three different occasions, the Karnataka High Court has ordered complete ban
on any kind of sale of tobacco or related products in 100 yards radius of
academic institutes and schools. The same has been re-iterated in a case where
Delhi High Court has found that such public nuisance, that harms school kids especially,
cannot be tolerated.
Analysis & Conclusion
The current restriction on smoking
is for hostel areas and associated canteens only. Although, after a few weeks,
today students can be seen smoking all around. A few hostel shops continue to sell
cigarettes to students. Furthermore, putting all laws, regulations and Hon’ble
Supreme Court’s orders at stake, our own IIT Kharagpur continues to allow sale
of cigarettes at certain places inside the campus.
Does a common sense or the legal
understanding of ‘campus area’ and ‘in radius of 100 yards’ will exclude
certain areas, if it is physically located inside IIT? In fact, these places
are very common and are even accessible to school students. Special privilege
is provided to these places which cannot be justified by any means. This also
creates a possibility of abuse of such dominant position which is endorsed by
the administration itself.
There are shops inside academic buildings that sells cigarettes. This particular shop is situated at the center of auditoriums and classrooms. The most famous canteen in IIT was never restricted by this particular order.
The IIT administration, especially
the top management, has shown strong will and has put commendable effort to
restrict smoking activities. But, with all due respect, they should act
stronger and send a clear message that we are not supposed to create smoke free
zones in different sectors of IIT, rather the whole IIT-Kgp is a 'Smoke Free
Zone.'
This is not a matter that requires a
crusade, it’s a simple matter with minimal of brainstorming. Law is as clear as
a raindrop, so is the morality. Right to life includes a ‘Smoke Free
Environment’ and such right cannot be diluted with any regulation or any
discount in rules. This not only concerns the kids and youth but also concerns
the future of India.
P.S. : With this article, I
tend to create an awareness that we should all pledge not to smoke inside IIT
campus or in 100 yard radius of IIT and understand that we can cherish our
liberty, but not at the cost of discomfort to others.
Author - Manish kumar
Author - Manish kumar
Disclaimer: This blog or any post thereof
is not to be considered to be in any way associated with the official stand of
IIT kharagpur or RGSOIPL on the issues being discussed in the said post. The
opinions on the blog are the authors own and should not be considered as legal
advice.
[1] Notice dated 10th February 2004 by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/AdvSearch.aspx)
[2] Notice dated 19th January 2005 by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/AdvSearch.aspx)
[3] Notice dated 5th December 2005 by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/AdvSearch.aspx)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Lets Discuss